Uncertainty

Uncertainty budget templates

A starting list of the contributions each calibration usually has, with the distribution the GUM assigns to that kind of knowledge and why. Open a template in the budget calculator, replace the numbers with your own evidence, and check the result with the Monte Carlo method.

Illustrative values, not a budget for your laboratory. Replace every number with your own evidence, remove rows that do not apply and add the ones your method has. The result is a calculated value, not a certified result.

Temperature

Pt100 by comparison in a liquid bath

A platinum resistance thermometer (or any probe with an indicator) is compared with a reference PRT in a stirred liquid bath.

Measurand: Correction to the UUT temperature at one point, in °C.

Open in the GUM budgetOpen in Monte Carlo
ContributionType · distributionIllustrative valueWhy this row and this distributionYour number comes from
Repeatability of the comparisonA · s/√n (ν = 5)6 readings, u = 0.000601 °CStandard deviation of the mean of repeated readings, s/√n, ν = n − 1 (GUM 4.2.3). Enter your readings; five to ten are usual.Your repeated differences UUT − reference at the point.
Reference PRT certificateB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.01, k = 2 °CThe reference’s calibration certificate states U and k; the standard uncertainty is U/k, normal (GUM 4.3.3–4.3.4).U and k at this temperature from the PRT’s certificate.
Reference PRT drift since calibrationB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.005 °CChange of the reference since its calibration, taken as equally likely anywhere within the bound, rectangular (GUM 4.3.7).The largest change between successive calibrations, or the maker’s stability figure.
Bath stability during the readingsB · U-shaped (arcsine)± 0.005 °CA controlled medium cycles between limits around its set point; the arc sine (U-shaped) distribution fits a value that spends most time near the extremes (JCGM 101 6.4.6).Half the peak-to-peak variation of the reference over the reading period.
Bath uniformity (reference to UUT position)B · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.004 °CDifference between where the reference and the UUT sit, bounded by the surveyed gradient, rectangular (GUM 4.3.7).Half the largest gradient across the working volume from your uniformity survey.
Reference indicator (bridge) certificateB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.003, k = 2 °CThe reference’s calibration certificate states U and k; the standard uncertainty is U/k, normal (GUM 4.3.3–4.3.4).The bridge or readout certificate, converted to temperature at the PRT’s sensitivity (about 0.39 Ω/°C for Pt100).
UUT indicator resolutionB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.005 °CHalf the least significant digit, rectangular (GUM F.2.2.1): the true value lies anywhere within the displayed step.Half the UUT display step (0.005 °C for a 0.01 °C display).
Self-heating differenceB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.002 °CThe measuring current warms both sensors; what matters is the difference between calibration and use conditions, bounded and rectangular.From a two-current test, or the maker’s self-heating figure at your current.

With these illustrative values the GUM budget gives u_c = 0.00797 °C, U = 0.0159 °C (k = 2, 95.45 %). Yours will differ.

Sources and caveats
  • JCGM 100:2008 (GUM): distributions per the clauses named in each row.
  • JCGM 101:2008 6.4.6: arc sine distribution for a cycling controlled temperature.
  • Structure of a comparison calibration in a liquid medium as described in the free EURAMET calibration guides for temperature (euramet.org); no table or example reproduced.
  • Caveat: Hysteresis of the UUT and stem-conduction (immersion) errors are not listed; add rows if your method does not eliminate them.
  • Caveat: If the UUT is a bare sensor read on your own bridge, replace the UUT resolution row with your bridge’s certificate and resolution.

Temperature

Thermocouple by comparison in a furnace or block

A base-metal thermocouple is compared with a reference thermometer in a furnace, dry block or bath, its EMF read on a voltmeter with a known reference junction.

Measurand: Correction to the UUT temperature at one point, in °C.

Open in the GUM budgetOpen in Monte Carlo
ContributionType · distributionIllustrative valueWhy this row and this distributionYour number comes from
Repeatability of the comparisonA · s/√n (ν = 4)5 readings, u = 0.0121 °CStandard deviation of the mean of repeated readings, s/√n, ν = n − 1 (GUM 4.2.3). Enter your readings; five to ten are usual.Your repeated differences at the point.
Reference thermometer certificateB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.1, k = 2 °CThe reference’s calibration certificate states U and k; the standard uncertainty is U/k, normal (GUM 4.3.3–4.3.4).From the reference’s certificate at this temperature.
Reference drift since calibrationB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.05 °CChange of the reference since its calibration, taken as equally likely anywhere within the bound, rectangular (GUM 4.3.7).Your history for the reference.
Reference junction temperatureB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.05 °CAn ice point or an electronic compensation holds the reference junction within a bound; the error passes to the hot-junction temperature almost one to one for a base-metal couple (use the thermocouple tool to convert if needed).The ice-point or compensator specification.
Furnace or block uniformityB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.15 °CDifference between where the reference and the UUT sit, bounded by the surveyed gradient, rectangular (GUM 4.3.7).From your uniformity survey at this temperature.
Furnace or block stabilityB · U-shaped (arcsine)± 0.05 °CA controlled medium cycles between limits around its set point; the arc sine (U-shaped) distribution fits a value that spends most time near the extremes (JCGM 101 6.4.6).Half the peak-to-peak variation over the reading period.
Voltmeter certificate and resolution, as temperatureB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.05, k = 2 °CThe voltmeter’s U at the EMF read, divided by the thermocouple’s Seebeck coefficient at the point (about 41 µV/°C for type K near 300 °C), normal.Voltmeter certificate at the EMF read, converted with the thermocouple tool.
UUT wire inhomogeneityB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.2 °CA thermocouple’s EMF depends on the temperature gradient along inhomogeneous wire; a bound from an immersion test, rectangular.Change in reading when the immersion is varied, or a conservative figure for the wire type.

With these illustrative values the GUM budget gives u_c = 0.164 °C, U = 0.329 °C (k = 2, 95.45 %). Yours will differ.

Sources and caveats
  • JCGM 100:2008 (GUM): distributions per the clauses named in each row.
  • Structure of thermocouple comparison calibration as described in the free EURAMET calibration guide for thermocouples (euramet.org); no table reproduced.
  • Seebeck coefficients from the NIST ITS-90 reference functions (the site’s thermocouple tool).
  • Caveat: Inhomogeneity usually dominates for used base-metal couples; measure it rather than assume it.
  • Caveat: For noble-metal couples the reference-junction and voltmeter rows get larger in temperature terms because the Seebeck coefficient is smaller.

Electrical

Digital multimeter, DC voltage against a calibrator

A multifunction calibrator sources a DC voltage and the DMM’s reading is compared with it.

Measurand: Error of the DMM reading at one point, in V.

Open in the GUM budgetOpen in Monte Carlo
ContributionType · distributionIllustrative valueWhy this row and this distributionYour number comes from
Repeatability of the DMM readingsA · s/√n (ν = 4)5 readings, u = 0.00000374 VStandard deviation of the mean of repeated readings, s/√n, ν = n − 1 (GUM 4.2.3). Enter your readings; five to ten are usual.Your repeated readings at the point.
Calibrator certificateB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.00003, k = 2 VThe reference’s calibration certificate states U and k; the standard uncertainty is U/k, normal (GUM 4.3.3–4.3.4).The calibrator’s certificate at this range and value.
Calibrator one-year specification (drift)B · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.00005 VIf you rely on the maker’s specification rather than the certificate, its ± limit is a rectangular bound (GUM 4.3.7). Use one or the other for the same effect, not both.The accuracy specification for the period since calibration, as an absolute value at this point (the spec-to-tolerance tool converts % of reading + floor).
DMM resolutionB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.000005 VHalf the least significant digit, rectangular (GUM F.2.2.1): the true value lies anywhere within the displayed step.Half the last digit on the range used.
Thermal EMFs in the leadsB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.000002 VDissimilar-metal junctions at the terminals add a small offset; bounded, rectangular. Reversing the leads and averaging removes most of it.The offset seen with the calibrator at zero, or a conservative bound for your leads.
Loading and lead effectsB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.000001 VThe DMM input resistance loads the calibrator output; the error is V·R_source/R_in, bounded, rectangular.Calculated from the calibrator output resistance and the DMM input resistance.

With these illustrative values the GUM budget gives u_c = 0.0000329 V, U = 0.0000658 V (k = 2, 95.45 %). Yours will differ.

Sources and caveats
  • JCGM 100:2008 (GUM): distributions per the clauses named in each row.
  • EA-4/02 M:2022 (EURAMET, free) contains a worked digital multimeter example of comparable structure; it is not reproduced here.
  • Caveat: Use the calibrator certificate or its specification for the calibrator’s own error, not both.
  • Caveat: At high voltage or on AC, add rows for the divider or the AC–DC difference.

Torque & Force

Hand torque wrench on a reference transducer

A setting-type or indicating hand torque tool is loaded against a reference torque transducer and indicator.

Measurand: Deviation of the wrench setting from the applied torque at one point, in N·m.

Open in the GUM budgetOpen in Monte Carlo
ContributionType · distributionIllustrative valueWhy this row and this distributionYour number comes from
Repeatability of the wrenchA · s/√n (ν = 4)5 readings, u = 0.121 N·mStandard deviation of the mean of repeated readings, s/√n, ν = n − 1 (GUM 4.2.3). Enter your readings; five to ten are usual.Your repeated releases or readings at the point (ASME B107.300 and ISO 6789 set the number of repeats; use theirs).
Reference transducer and indicator certificateB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.1, k = 2 N·mThe reference’s calibration certificate states U and k; the standard uncertainty is U/k, normal (GUM 4.3.3–4.3.4).From the transducer system’s certificate at this torque.
Reference drift since calibrationB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.05 N·mChange of the reference since its calibration, taken as equally likely anywhere within the bound, rectangular (GUM 4.3.7).Your history, or the maker’s long-term stability figure.
Indicator resolutionB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.05 N·mHalf the least significant digit, rectangular (GUM F.2.2.1): the true value lies anywhere within the displayed step.Half the indicator’s display step at this range.
Reproducibility (re-mounting, operator)B · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.2 N·mChanging the square-drive engagement, the loading point on the handle or the operator shifts the result; bounded by observation, rectangular.Spread seen when the wrench is remounted and reloaded, from your method validation.
Temperature effect on the transducerB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.02 N·mThe transducer’s temperature coefficient times the departure from its calibration temperature, rectangular.Coefficient from the transducer data sheet times your laboratory’s temperature range.
Loading point and side-loadB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.1 N·mForce applied off the marked point or off-axis changes the torque the wrench sees; bounded by the fixture’s geometry, rectangular.From your fixture’s alignment tolerance and handle marking.

With these illustrative values the GUM budget gives u_c = 0.189 N·m, U = 0.398 N·m (k = 2.11, 95.45 %). Yours will differ.

Sources and caveats
  • JCGM 100:2008 (GUM): distributions per the clauses named in each row.
  • Test method and number of repeats: ASME B107.300 and ISO 6789 (purchase from the publishers; not reproduced).
  • Structure of torque measuring device uncertainty as described in the free EURAMET calibration guide for torque (euramet.org); no table reproduced.
  • Caveat: For a setting-type wrench the measurand is the release torque; the repeatability row then holds the released values.
  • Caveat: Clockwise and counter-clockwise are separate budgets if the wrench is calibrated both ways.

Dimensional

Gauge block by comparison (GUM H.1 structure)

An end gauge is compared with a calibrated standard of the same nominal length on a comparator, both at about 20 °C.

Measurand: Deviation of the gauge block’s length from nominal at 20 °C, in nm.

Open in the GUM budgetOpen in Monte Carlo
ContributionType · distributionIllustrative valueWhy this row and this distributionYour number comes from
Repeatability of the measured differenceA · s/√n (ν = 4)5 readings, u = 1.36 nmStandard deviation of the mean of repeated readings, s/√n, ν = n − 1 (GUM 4.2.3). Enter your readings; five to ten are usual.Your repeated comparator differences (standard − UUT).
Calibration of the standardB · Normal, stated U and kU = 45, k = 2 nmThe reference’s calibration certificate states U and k; the standard uncertainty is U/k, normal (GUM 4.3.3–4.3.4).U and k from the standard’s certificate for this length.
Comparator random effects (from history)B · Normal, stated U and kU = 6, k = 1, ν = 24 nmThe comparator’s random error established from a pooled set of earlier measurements, used as a standard uncertainty with its degrees of freedom (GUM H.1.3.2).Pooled standard deviation of your comparator checks and its degrees of freedom.
Comparator systematic effectsB · Normal, stated U and kU = 4, k = 1, ν = 8 nmResidual systematic error of the comparator after correction, from its own calibration (GUM H.1.3.2).From the comparator’s calibration.
Thermal expansion coefficient of the standardB · Rectangular (uniform)± 1.2 nmThe uncertainty of α_s (about ±2 × 10⁻⁶ /K, rectangular) times the length and the departure from 20 °C; here converted to nm already (GUM H.1.3.3).Your α uncertainty × nominal length × |t − 20 °C| (the thermal expansion tool gives the row).
Temperature of the comparator bedB · Normal, stated U and kU = 3.5, k = 1 nmMean departure of the bed from 20 °C with its uncertainty, times L·α (GUM H.1.3.4).From your thermometer’s certificate and the bed survey, times L·α.
Cyclic variation of the bed temperatureB · U-shaped (arcsine)± 5 nmThe thermostatically controlled bed cycles about its mean; an arc sine distribution for the cyclic term (GUM H.1.3.4), times L·α.Half the amplitude of the cycle, times L·α.
Difference in expansion coefficientsB · Rectangular (uniform)± 2.9 nmδα between standard and UUT, bounded, rectangular, times L·(t − 20) (GUM H.1.3.5).Your bound on δα × L × |t − 20 °C|.
Difference in temperature between blocksB · Rectangular (uniform)± 8 nmδθ between the two blocks, bounded, rectangular, times L·α (GUM H.1.3.6).Your bound on δθ × L × α.

With these illustrative values the GUM budget gives u_c = 24.7 nm, U = 49.4 nm (k = 2, 95.45 %). Yours will differ.

Sources and caveats
  • JCGM 100:2008 (GUM) Annex H.1, Example: end-gauge calibration. The structure and the choice of distributions follow H.1.3; the illustrative numbers here are placeholders in nanometres, not the GUM’s figures.
  • Caveat: The GUM example also carries second-order terms (H.1.7); add them when δα and δθ are both large.
  • Caveat: Rows are given in nm after multiplying by the sensitivity coefficients; enter your own products or use the thermal expansion tool, which outputs rows with sensitivities.

Mass & Balances

Weight by substitution against a reference weight

A test weight is compared with a reference weight of the same nominal value on a mass comparator by ABBA or ABA substitution.

Measurand: Conventional mass correction of the test weight, in mg.

Open in the GUM budgetOpen in Monte Carlo
ContributionType · distributionIllustrative valueWhy this row and this distributionYour number comes from
Repeatability of the weighing differencesA · s/√n (ν = 5)6 readings, u = 0.000601 mgStandard deviation of the mean of repeated readings, s/√n, ν = n − 1 (GUM 4.2.3). Enter your readings; five to ten are usual.Your ABBA (or ABA) differences at this nominal value.
Reference weight certificateB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.03, k = 2 mgThe reference’s calibration certificate states U and k; the standard uncertainty is U/k, normal (GUM 4.3.3–4.3.4).U and k of the reference’s conventional mass from its certificate.
Reference weight instabilityB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.01 mgChange of the reference since its calibration, taken as equally likely anywhere within the bound, rectangular (GUM 4.3.7).Change between successive calibrations of the reference.
Balance resolutionB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.005 mgHalf the least significant digit, rectangular (GUM F.2.2.1): the true value lies anywhere within the displayed step. In a substitution it enters twice (two readings per difference), so the half-width is √2 times half a digit.√2 × half the comparator’s scale interval d.
Balance eccentricityB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.004 mgOff-centre loading changes the indication; bounded by the eccentricity test, rectangular.From your eccentricity test at this load.
Balance sensitivityB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.002 mgThe indicated difference is scaled by the balance sensitivity, whose uncertainty applies to the measured difference, rectangular.Sensitivity uncertainty × the difference measured.
Air buoyancy correctionB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.008 mgThe correction (ρ_a − ρ₀)·(V_t − V_r) is uncertain through the air density and the volumes; bounded, rectangular. The air density tool gives ρ_a and the buoyancy tool the correction.Propagate u(ρ_a) and u(V) through the correction; small when both weights are the same alloy.

With these illustrative values the GUM budget gives u_c = 0.0172 mg, U = 0.0344 mg (k = 2, 95.45 %). Yours will differ.

Sources and caveats
  • JCGM 100:2008 (GUM): distributions per the clauses named in each row.
  • OIML R 111-1:2004 Annex C describes the uncertainty calculation for weight calibration (weighing process, reference weight, air buoyancy, balance); the structure is followed, nothing reproduced.
  • Caveat: For weights of different material (stainless steel against brass or cast iron) the buoyancy row can dominate; measure air density rather than assume it.
  • Caveat: Magnetic effects are not listed; add a row when the weights or the comparator pan are susceptible.

Pressure

Pressure gauge against a reference (deadweight tester or transducer)

A dial or digital pressure gauge is compared with a deadweight tester or a reference transducer on a common manifold, rising and falling.

Measurand: Error of the gauge reading at one point, in kPa.

Open in the GUM budgetOpen in Monte Carlo
ContributionType · distributionIllustrative valueWhy this row and this distributionYour number comes from
Repeatability of the gauge readingsA · s/√n (ν = 4)5 readings, u = 0.051 kPaStandard deviation of the mean of repeated readings, s/√n, ν = n − 1 (GUM 4.2.3). Enter your readings; five to ten are usual.Your repeated readings at the point.
Reference certificateB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.15, k = 2 kPaThe reference’s calibration certificate states U and k; the standard uncertainty is U/k, normal (GUM 4.3.3–4.3.4).From the deadweight tester or transducer certificate at this pressure (the deadweight tester tool gives the pressure from the masses).
Reference drift since calibrationB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.05 kPaChange of the reference since its calibration, taken as equally likely anywhere within the bound, rectangular (GUM 4.3.7).Your history for the reference.
Height (head) correctionB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.03 kPaThe reference and the UUT sense pressure at different heights; the head correction (ρ·g·Δh) is uncertain through Δh and the fluid density, rectangular (the liquid head tool computes it).u(Δh) × ρ × g, plus the density uncertainty for liquid media.
UUT resolutionB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.25 kPaHalf the least significant digit, rectangular (GUM F.2.2.1): the true value lies anywhere within the displayed step. For a dial gauge, half the smallest readable fraction of a division.Half the display step, or half of what you can read between dial graduations.
UUT hysteresisB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.3 kPaDifference between rising and falling readings at the same point; half of it as a rectangular half-width (GUM F.2.2.2).Half the rising–falling difference at the point.
Temperature of the referenceB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.02 kPaThe reference’s temperature coefficient (for a piston gauge, the thermal expansion of the piston–cylinder area) times the departure from its reference temperature, rectangular.Coefficient × your temperature range at the reference.

With these illustrative values the GUM budget gives u_c = 0.246 kPa, U = 0.492 kPa (k = 2, 95.45 %). Yours will differ.

Sources and caveats
  • JCGM 100:2008 (GUM): distributions per the clauses named in each row.
  • Structure of pressure gauge calibration as described in the free EURAMET calibration guide for pressure gauges (euramet.org) and, for the reference, EURAMET cg-3 for pressure balances; no table reproduced.
  • Caveat: If the UUT is read at rising pressure only and reported so, drop the hysteresis row.
  • Caveat: For gas media at low gauge pressure the head row can be negligible; for oil it is often not.

Humidity

Humidity probe in a chamber against a chilled-mirror reference

A relative humidity probe is compared with a chilled-mirror hygrometer (dew point) and a reference thermometer in a climatic chamber.

Measurand: Correction to the UUT relative humidity at one point, in %rh.

Open in the GUM budgetOpen in Monte Carlo
ContributionType · distributionIllustrative valueWhy this row and this distributionYour number comes from
Repeatability of the comparisonA · s/√n (ν = 4)5 readings, u = 0.022 %rhStandard deviation of the mean of repeated readings, s/√n, ν = n − 1 (GUM 4.2.3). Enter your readings; five to ten are usual.Your repeated differences UUT − reference at the point.
Reference dew point certificate, as %rhB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.3, k = 2 %rhThe reference’s calibration certificate states U and k; the standard uncertainty is U/k, normal (GUM 4.3.3–4.3.4). The dew-point uncertainty is converted to relative humidity at the chamber temperature (the humidity tool gives the sensitivity).Dew-point U from the certificate × ∂RH/∂t_d at your point.
Reference temperature certificate, as %rhB · Normal, stated U and kU = 0.15, k = 2 %rhRelative humidity depends on the air temperature at the UUT; the reference thermometer’s U is converted with ∂RH/∂t (about −0.3 %rh per 0.1 °C at 50 %rh, 23 °C).Temperature U × ∂RH/∂t at your point.
Chamber uniformity (reference to UUT position)B · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.4 %rhDifference between where the reference and the UUT sit, bounded by the surveyed gradient, rectangular (GUM 4.3.7).From your chamber survey, in %rh, including the temperature gradient converted to %rh.
Chamber stability during the readingsB · U-shaped (arcsine)± 0.3 %rhA controlled medium cycles between limits around its set point; the arc sine (U-shaped) distribution fits a value that spends most time near the extremes (JCGM 101 6.4.6).Half the peak-to-peak variation of the reference over the reading period.
UUT resolutionB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.05 %rhHalf the least significant digit, rectangular (GUM F.2.2.1): the true value lies anywhere within the displayed step.Half the UUT display step.
Reference drift since calibrationB · Rectangular (uniform)± 0.1 %rhChange of the reference since its calibration, taken as equally likely anywhere within the bound, rectangular (GUM 4.3.7).Your history for the mirror hygrometer and the thermometer.

With these illustrative values the GUM budget gives u_c = 0.362 %rh, U = 0.724 %rh (k = 2, 95.45 %). Yours will differ.

Sources and caveats
  • JCGM 100:2008 (GUM): distributions per the clauses named in each row.
  • Sensitivities ∂RH/∂t_d and ∂RH/∂t from the site’s humidity tool (Hardy 1998 ITS-90 formulation).
  • Structure of relative humidity calibration in a chamber as described in the free EURAMET calibration guide for humidity (euramet.org); no table reproduced.
  • Caveat: Hysteresis of polymer RH sensors can be several tenths of %rh; add a row when the probe is calibrated rising and falling.
  • Caveat: Convert everything to %rh at the chamber temperature before combining.

Starting structures only. Distributions per JCGM 100:2008 (4.2.3, 4.3.3–4.3.4, 4.3.7, 4.3.9, F.2.2.1, F.2.2.2, H.1) and JCGM 101:2008 6.4.6. The lists of contributions follow the usual comparison methods and the free EURAMET calibration guides and OIML R 111-1 Annex C in structure; no published example or table is reproduced. Templates are also available to AI assistants through the MCP server tool budget_templates.